Yesterday we looked at Glen Weldon’s
wonderful new book, Caped Crusade:
Batman and the Rise of Nerd Culture, and that got us to thinking. (Before we get to thinking, though, let’s
reiterate that Weldon’s book is quite terrific and highly recommended.) Is Batman
art? And is a deep engagement with
Batman (or other facets of Nerd Culture) a worthwhile endeavor?
Before we start exploring, let’s set
some ground rules. We here at The Jade Sphinx have given serious
consideration to pop fiction and film, along with kiddie books. We have also examined literary, artistic and musical
works by great masters. Clearly, we
think that pop fictions are worthy of serious consideration … but the mistake
this discussion often makes is equating serious consideration with serious
art.
But that is not the case. Kiddie lit and pop fiction can be crafted
with varying degrees of artistry, but that does not necessarily make it art. Oh, it can be art, but it does not transmute
into art simply through virtue of its examination. A doctoral thesis on Batman, for example, may
result in a diploma, but the intrinsic quality of our pointed-eared friend and
the body of work about him remains unchanged.
Now, the call to canonize kitsch is
a relatively new phenomenon. From the
1930s through the 1960s – a time of unprecedented media saturation – junk art
for children was enjoyed by children. In
what seems was a more innocent time, there were whole industries creating art
for children: comic strips and books, movie serials, radio shows, animated
cartoons and hosts of literary options created expressly for everyone from
beginning readers to teenagers. Adults
could sometimes dip in an appreciative toe to remember the sweet currents of
youth, and may even enjoy much of the material, but to become an avid consumer
of such was a sign of feeble-mindedness.
Pop fiction for adults also fully
realized (and embraced) its limitations.
One well remembers Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s dedication to his 1912 novel
The Lost World (a masterpiece of its
kind): I have wrought my simple plan/If
I give one hour of joy/To the boy who’s half a man,/Or the man who’s half a
boy. That lovely and poetic preamble
is suitable for so much that came before and after, everything from Fu Manchu and Tarzan, to James Bond
and Indiana Jones. Good pop fiction can be terrific stuff:
insightful, bracing, engaging and amusing.
It is not to be sneered at; nor, however, is it to be overestimated.
We are not saying, to be clear, that
it is impossible for a piece of genre fiction or popular entertainment to
elevate into the realm of higher art. Wind in the Willows, The House at Pooh Corner and Peter Pan are magnificent books, transcending
the designation of mere kiddie lit to soar to literary heights. And one need only to think of Poe, of much of H.G. Wells and Robert Louis
Stevenson, of Graham Greene or Dashiell Hammett, to realize that many
classic novels could also be shelved in the genre sections of your local
bookstore. But, again, such company doesn’t
elevate a genre en toto.
But over the last few decades what has changed in the culture at large is a
flight from adulthood and complexity, from the challenges of great art and
great beauty, and a retreat into comfortable and childish enthusiasms. Worse than that, consumers of pop culture are
demanding that attention not only be paid, but that entry to the Canon is fair
and just. And, in so doing, they debase
the wonderful raw power of pop fiction, and the innocence of kiddie lit.
In the 1990s, I was frankly amazed
at the adult craze for Harry Potter
books. This is in no way to say that
these books were bad, but they were written for children, and a deep
identification with them signifies a lack of seriousness. Worse still, as more and more adults read
them, the books lost more and more of their grounding in a child’s world,
ending with what was to be the Gotterdammerung
of kiddie books. It became almost
impossible to read the last novel in the corpus and remember that it all
started with some kids playing ball from atop some brooms.
Much the same thing for adults who
obsess over Batman. It is adults (of
questionable maturity) who have demanded the darker, brooding, psychopathic
Batman. It was the same adults who have
consigned the sunnier, smiling, and more optimistic Superman into oblivion, insufficiently
violent or complex and now hopelessly passé.
What these adults playing with
children’s toys forget is that amusements made for children cannot bear the
weight they wish to impose upon them. We
are supposed to move on from the amusements of our youth to more challenging,
complex and elevating fare. Enjoy them
as palette cleaners, but then get onto the main meal. The answer is not to make Batman relevant to
adults (an impossibility), but to embrace the challenge of real adult art.
And, again, read and look at what
you want. But a steady diet of aesthetic
and cultural junk is much like a steady diet of junk food: it will
significantly impair your physical and mental health, greatly diminish your
quality of life, and, in the long run, it will kill you.
Now, we make our children’s
entertainment for adults. I can think of few more damming condemnations
of us as a culture and as a people that we actually make Batman or Superman
movies that are so violent … that children
cannot see them. Stop for a moment and ponder how … impossible that would
have been as little as 50 years ago. The
idea of a “serious” Batman movie would have been met with well-deserved
derision. But not today. The cheapening of our culture since the 1960s
(and the concomitant tenets of aesthetic relativity), have made this dumbing
down not only possible, but inevitable. The
highest grossing films of the year are blockbusters based on 40 year old
superhero comics. This lack of adulthood
has poisoned our language, our music, our political discourse.
This corruption has bled into
everything. For example, in the
just-released Against Democracy, a political
screed published by Princeton University
Press (!), author Jason Brennan
breaks the body politic into three classes:
hobbits, hooligans and vulcans.
Hobbits…? Vulcans...?
Really? Is that what 21st
Century adulthood has become?
I love pop fiction. And when pop fiction is working on all
cylinders, it can be wonderful, terrific and … art of a kind. But it’s like a twinkie: I’ll eat them, but
it’s not my sole diet. And if the very
notion of adulthood is to survive, we have to get back to the business of
serious art, or our emotional, intellectual and philosophical selves are
finished.
Tomorrow:
James Bond – it aint art, but nobody does it better.
No comments:
Post a Comment