Our recent
trip to the New York Historical Society
and our glimpse of the costume George
Reeves (1914-1959) wore during his titular stint on The Adventures of Superman (1952-1958), got us thinking about that
noteworthy and rather sad talent.
There are
many today who sneer at Reeve’s performance as Clark Kent/Superman, most of
them too young to have seen the show during its original run, or even in
reruns. A quick view at the comments
section of science fiction junk-news site www.io9.com,
for instance, would reveal pimply basement-dwellers labeling Reeves as creepy,
fey, lightweight or overweight. This is,
of course, a sad commentary on contemporary science fiction buffs. In a world where Superman films are grim,
ponderous affairs, where superheroes are treated with a weight and reverence denied
even the greatest of literary classics, certainly the talents of a man like
Reeves would be unwelcome.
However,
sometimes it’s the times, and not the levels of artistry, that are off
track. Reeve was the perfect Superman
for what was fundamentally a different (and better) America. In the absence of identity politics, and buttressed
by an intelligent and informed middle-brow, middle-class, it was possible to
attack comic book material with both sincerity and fun without slipping into
pretention and flummery.
Reeves was
a player with an easy smile (indeed, a high-octane
smile), a gentle demeanor and a true Everyman accessibility. His Superman was decent, kind, concerned and
engaged. He was also distinctly American,
back when American idealism and values actually, to some degree, existed. One well remembers Reeves as an angry Superman
chasing away a mob of rednecks who wanted to murder some rather child-like
people from the Earth’s core. “You’re
acting like Nazi Stormtroopers!”
Better
still was Reeves’ take on Clark Kent. Rather
than the high-voiced milquetoast heard on radio, and later essayed by his successor,
Christopher Reeve (1952-2004), Reeves’
Kent is a confident, capable investigative reporter, more than equal to most
any occasion. One often wondered why
Superman was needed at all – with this Kent on the job, things were already on
track for a just resolution. (This is
essential if one is going to understand Superman rather than, say, Batman.
The benign, decent and crusading Clark Kent is the real human being, and
Superman merely the disguise. Batman,
though, is the real human being, or what is left of one, and Bruce Wayne merely
a convenient fiction.)
The great
tragedy of Reeves was his untimely death, deemed a suicide, though clouded by
mystery to this day. This incident has
haunted many Baby-Boomers for decades, (for instance, Frank Dello Stritto writes about it eloquently in his recent book, I Saw What I Saw When I Saw It), and
has fueled the speculations of countless armchair detectives.
So it is no
surprise that Hollywood would eventually attempt to tell the story itself. The resulting film, Hollywoodland, written by Paul
Bernbaum and directed by Allen
Coulter, is a hit-and-miss affair, but it does manage to remain affective
and poignant.
To tell the
story, Bernbaum creates a fictional frame to tell the actual facts: a
down-on-his-luck private eye named Louis Simo (Adrien Brody) is hired by Reeves’ mother (Lois Smith). She is
convinced that Reeves would never have killed himself; Simo takes the case to
win back the affection of his ex-wife (Mollly
Parker) and son (Zach Mills).
The trail
leads him into the world of Hollywood high-rollers Eddie Mannix (Bob Hoskins),
general manager at MGM, and his wife Toni (Diane
Lane), who was Reeves’ longtime lover.
Brody is
miserably miscast as the gumshoe, a part more suited to the melancholy talents
of someone like the late Robert Mitchum
(1917-1997). (The framing device of Simo
never really takes off, either, and one wonders why Bernbaum thought it
necessary.) Hoskins maintains a
dangerous edge of menace and animal cunning … it would be an intrepid (or
stupid) man who tangled with him.
Lane is
nothing short of magnificent as Toni Mannix, a bottomless pit of doubt, need
and self-pity. Her hungers and
humiliations are uncomfortably real, and it’s stunning for an adult actress to
allow herself to appear so naked and vulnerable. Why this performance wasn’t considered
Oscar-worthy is a great injustice.
However, the
film belongs completely to Ben Affleck
(born 1972), who plays Reeves in flashback.
While not as winning or innocently charming as Reeves himself, Affleck
successfully channels the late actor’s nonchalance, his easy manner and his
doughy sensuality. An inherently decent
man in an indecent place, Reeves’ life spirals out of control as he loses his career,
his self-respect, and his own self-image.
It’s a complex and ingratiating performance, and Affleck has never been
better.
Finally,
the reason Hollywoodland works so
well is the reason so many superhero films are disappointing: this film relies
upon complex human relationships and often contradictory emotional
attachments. It’s an internal drama,
rather than an empty spectacle, and it details the inner turmoil of a real
super man.
No comments:
Post a Comment