Though the
fact is probably sending Harold Bloom
into cardiac arrest, it is past-time that we acknowledge that Stephen King (born 1947) is one of the
Great Men of American Letters. This has
been a contentious point among critics and academics – King is an unashamedly
commercial writer (of horror and fantasy fiction, yet!), is pointedly ‘non-literary,’
and, worse still, extremely popular. Three
points which would destroy the critical reputation of any writer.
But …
King has proven to be just not any writer.
The author of 50 novels and some 200 short stories, his works have sold
over 350 million copies, and that is not counting his screenplays, reviews and
essays. His novel, 11/22/63, takes as its conceit a time traveler seeking to stop the
Kennedy assassination, and was one of the most satisfying reads I’ve had in
some time.
Why has
it taken so long for King to finally be rewarded with critical acclaim he so
richly (abundantly!) deserves? I would
venture to guess that much of it has to do with class. Arts criticism in the US is largely conceived
along lines of social class; most anything embraced by “the people” is
instantly suspect, and critics who take it seriously do so at their peril. This is not to say that all Pop Culture is worthy;
most of it, in fact, is trash. But not
all success is suspect – sometimes, artists become wealthy and beloved simply because
… they are good at what they do.
These thoughts
were in my head while I started the summer by reading King’s charming, sweet
and gently nostalgic novel, Joyland. Though King is celebrated for his horrors and
his deft control of suspense, for this reviewer, his real genius lies in
recording the experience of the boyhood of American Baby Boomers.
King is,
in fact, the Poet Laureate of Boyhood. The
portions of his novels that always affected me most were the sections featuring
his young adult protagonists. Adolescent
males are found in books as diverse as It,
Salem’s Lot, Christine, and Hearts in
Atlantis, as well as his masterful short story The Body. I always felt that
King had a peculiar knack for describing the experience of boyhood, with its
rich joys, its even richer longings, its glorious victories and its often
unforgettable defeats. It is the thing
he does best.
Joyland
is set in a North Carolina amusement park in 1973. The protagonist is Devin Jones, a student at
the University of New Hampshire who takes a summer job at Joyland amusement
park. Devin finds that he has a talent for "wearing the fur,"
Joyland-talk for portraying Howie the Happy Hound, the park’s mascot. One day,
he saves a child from choking on a park hot dog. The heroics earn him the trust
and admiration of the park's owner, and he receives additional responsibilities.
As
summer goes on, Devin and his friends learn that several years earlier a girl
had been murdered in the haunted house attraction, and her ghost still haunts the ride. Of course, Devin and his friends investigate
the story; while doing so, Devin also befriends a frail, wheelchair bound boy
and his mother.
It’s
important to note that the tone of the book is much more important than its Hardy-Boys-At-The Fair plot, and that
tone is one of wistful nostalgia. Devin
straddles childhood and adulthood throughout the novel. He loses his virginity, learns the fragility
of life, and comes to the conclusion that people are not always as they seem. The book is told in flashback by the
now-adult Devin, who looks on at his younger self with a sometimes rueful eye.
One of
the many touching things about Devin is that he genuinely likes children, which
is rare in a young adult. Dressing up as
Howie the Happy Hound is a noble calling, as Devin’s boss explains to him: This
is a badly broken world, full of wars and cruelty and senseless tragedy. Every
human being who inhabits it is served his or her portion of unhappiness and
wakeful nights. . . . Given such sad but undeniable facts of the human
condition, you have been given a priceless gift this summer: you are here to
sell fun.
It could
almost be King’s manifesto.
At this
point, I must confess that reading King in the key of Adolescent Boy will often
make this reviewer cry. I did not cry
while reading The Body … I
wept. King connects with our collective
youth in a way that few writers can, and whenever I read his books I am
confronted by the stark, often terrible realization of all that I have lost
with adulthood. Somehow, there is a very
young man deep inside of King’s psyche who remembers exactly how it was. Much like Ray Bradbury, to read Stephen King
is to be young again.
In that
respect, Joyland does not disappoint, and I found myself crying as Devin
made that often agonizing transition from boyhood to adulthood. The plot of Joyland may only “get the job
done,” but the character of Devin is the kind of thing that makes King, in all
his messy glory, a “literary writer.”
Joyland
is a novel about summer and about our shared American experience. Read it before the season ends.
No comments:
Post a Comment